A detour down Knockturn Alley: Manipulating J.K. Rowling’s remarks on Harry, Hermione, and Ron

A detour down Knockturn Alley: Manipulating J.K. Rowling’s remarks on Harry, Hermione, and Ron

Unless you’ve been hiding deep underground in a high-security Gringotts vault, you’ve likely seen the recent media blitz following remarks author J.K. Rowling made on her three main characters: Harry Potter, Hermione Granger, and Ronald Weasley.

Following an article posted in the Sunday Times, which lent a preview of an interview of Rowling by Emma Watson (who portrayed Hermione in the films), the Internet exploded with news posts, followed by countless thought pieces and open letters, all surrounding the perceived idea that Rowling had turned her back on pairing up Ron and Hermione and that Harry and Hermione were the better couple.

Day after day, there was no shortage of coverage on the topic, from print media to cable news broadcasts to radio commentary. As more and more Harry Potter fans, and even casual readers, read up on the story, the passionate responses reached incredible levels. Supporters of the Ron and Hermione couple were furious; Rowling had destroyed their perfect romance. Meanwhile, those determined Harry and Hermione backers were overjoyed; the author had given them vindication.

But wait a second. Had Rowling actually done those things? Had she actually admitted to regretting pairing up Ron and Hermione? Was she now telling millions of Potter fans worldwide that she had given them the wrong story? Had she doomed Ron yet again to falling short of happiness?

Well, to put it simply – no.

Instead, news outlets took the author’s remarks completely out of context… before the full context was even available. We can assert that even more now, with the full interview now available. Eager keystrokes fired away to the tune of Rita Skeeter’s Quick Quotes Quill, creating a firestorm before Rowling’s full remarks were even known – drawing an uncanny comparison to the practices of the author’s fictional Daily Prophet.

The story explodes with a single word that J.K. Rowling never used herself

Through her Potter books, and even in her latest novel The Cuckoo’s Calling under pseudonym Robert Galbraith, Rowling has frequently warned us about the power of an imprudent press. Still, many fell victim during this latest news run.

The Sunday Times did a rather poor job with their preview of the interview, titling the article “JK admits Harry should have wed Hermione.” Rowling never claims this in the actual interview. Following that, most of the sensationalism can be attributed to the misuse of a single word: regret.

“J.K. Rowling regrets Ron and Hermione’s relationship”
“Regrets over Ron/Hermione pairing?! An open letter to JK Rowling”
“J.K. Rowling Says She Regrets Matching Ron And Hermione”

A quick search will turn you up several articles that are very similar to these actual headlines. Some news outlets have since changed these headlines, but long after the damage (and their spike in site traffic) was done.

These news organizations, either complicity or unknowingly, misrepresented the truth of what Rowling was actually saying about her characters and story. Not only did they take her remarks out of context – they used a word she never even used herself, eliciting a specific connotation that was never there. Readers of these stories quickly shared the headlines across social media, and the misinformation spread like wildfire.

Before long, people with very high social media followings – including other popular authors – were directly or indirectly criticizing Rowling for her “revisionist comments,” when now we know it was merely a reflective moment for an author who was, for the most part, giving us insight into her reasoning for writing things the way she did.

The widespread poor journalism presents an alarming case study

Outlandish editorials and commentary are nothing new, especially in the Potter fandom. Fans have frequently criticized or questioned aspects of the series, and that is perfectly fine. In fact, it’s wonderful. It’s the power of any form of art.

But something entirely different happened here. A couple of entertainment news sites took it upon themselves to report the story in a very particular way, injecting new words and context to make it a controversial read. In some ways, we shouldn’t be too surprised. Sensationalism sells. The part of this latest run that is rather jarring, though, is how major, reputable news organizations picked up the story and also ran with faulty language.

NPR, the Los Angeles Times, CNN, The Independent, and other news outlets used the word “regret” to headline their stories, which led into analysis pieces on how Rowling was admitting she got it all wrong. Of course, Rowling never said anything of the sort. If you put their articles side-by-side with the preview image from The Sunday Times, you might wonder just how they came to such a final edition.

The important thing here is legitimate news sources – sources that also report on domestic and foreign policy – simply did not fact check when it came to the Rowling story. This is alarming. Harry Potter fans deserve better, but more importantly, the general public deserves to be better informed.

While it’s true the full interview did finally come out, exposing these pieces for the poor reporting that they hold, it does not undo all of the damage and does not erase some of the very troubling responses to the news.

Everyone deserves room for reflection and perspective

J.K. Rowling has been unfairly criticized through the past week. Of course, the author is no stranger to this type of attention and likely has built up a thick skin to such scrutiny. But it doesn’t ameliorate the bigger problem of how we respond to an author’s reflection about his/her work.

Yes, books belong to their readers. Art belongs to the audience. But this should not close the door on an author’s ability to talk about his/her writing process, the development of his/her characters, and the subtext of certain scenes. We should welcome that from an author.

Some writers took this opportunity to call out Rowling on previous remarks on her series, branching beyond these purported declarations about Harry, Hermione, and Ron. Several list-style articles popped up, presenting nothing but lackluster commentary juxtaposed with flashy subtitles and GIFs.

Other articles came in the form of open letters, where some thought it prudent to issue out a list of grievances of what they disliked in the series. One point that was upsetting to see mentioned in a negative light more than once was Rowling’s revelation that Dumbledore is gay, following the release of Deathly Hallows. The troubling commentary included claims that since Dumbledore “never acts or appears gay in the books,” then Rowling had no right to add this fact to what we know about the character, as well as the accusation that the author added this fact later to come across as more “gay-friendly.” Both are horrible arguments and fully expose the neglect of recognizing a very important and justified remark about the series.

There is nothing wrong with engaging in debate about different aspects of the books, but using out-of-context reports as a launching pad to claim Rowling wrote the series “wrong” is not only ignorant, but offensive – both the author and her readers.

The story does not change

Rowling never set out to revise her own writing in this interview. Poor journalism that botched this story from the start not only blew Rowling’s remarks completely out of context, but also ruined what should have been a wonderful moment for the Harry Potter fandom. Both Rowling and Watson both share incredible insight through the interview, not just talking about the three fictional characters, but challenges that we all face – a truth that has always spelled out the true magic of this series.

One wonderful line came from Watson in discussing Ron’s character, on how he always felt the pressures of being second-best:

“I think life presents to you over and over again your biggest and most painful fear – until you conquer it. It just keeps coming up.”

Rowling praised Watson’s incredible insight and agreed:

“That is so true, it has happened in my own life. The issue keeps coming up because you are drawn to it and you are putting yourself in front of it all the time. At a certain point you have to choose what to do about it and sometimes conquering it is choosing to say: I don’t want that anymore, I’m going to stop walking up to you because there is nothing there for me. But yes, you’re so right, that’s very insightful! Ron’s used to playing second fiddle. I think that’s a comfortable role for him, but at a certain point he has to be his own man, doesn’t he?”

So we finally reach a point that should satisfy all true Harry Potter fans: the story does not change. Hermione still ends up with Ron. Harry still ends up with Ginny. Yet, we get a very powerful set of responses from Rowling, in which she recognizes the difficulties Ron and Hermione would face and acknowledges the possibility and practicality of Harry and Hermione as a couple.

But in the end, it was Ron and Hermione. Nothing Rowling said changes that. Her remarks do not sell short the relationship between the two, but rather makes it more realistic. Nor do her responses take away from the Hermione and Harry moments, such as the “what are we doing?” tent scene Rowling discusses.

On Hermione and Ron’s future, Rowling even responds in a way that those fiercely clinging to “books belong to their readers” should appreciate:

“Oh, maybe she and Ron will be alright with a bit of counseling, you know. I wonder what happens at wizard marriage counseling? They’ll probably be fine. He needs to work on his self-esteem issues and she needs to work on being a little less critical.”

She doesn’t settle the debate firmly, but merely tosses out the idea. What happens between the couple, and all of the surviving characters, is still completely left up to the reader’s imagination.

Most of the initial coverage of this story represented remarkably bad journalism, and the out-of-context analysis that followed was even worse. There is always room for differing opinions and ideas, but this fandom is above giving the Rita Skeeters of the web too much attention and credence. J.K. Rowling taught us so much better than that.

Editorial by Caleb Graves, MuggleNet Contributing Editor


  1. The fact people who love J.K. Rowling and her writing immediately believed that she had said anything like that from the start is immensely disappointing. It was such an out of character and blunt statement that it was clearly designed to insight debate among fans. All you have to do is read the books to know that there was no way Harry and Hermione were a likely coupling and for the author herself to undermine years of work and dedication to a book series like that? To not even understand her own characters?! She would have to have rewritten the entire series to justify coupling Harry and Hermione as anything more than friends. JKR has never been the type of person to pull shallow publicity stunts and that’s what this was – the press trying to stir up the Harry Potter fandom and it worked. Well done people, well done to those of you who instantly believed this instead of considering the possibility that without the published interview to back it up, that maybe it wasn’t true.

  2. Instead of riding your journalism high horse, you guys should consider the fact that the writing on the MuggleNet home page has been horrific over the past year or two.

  3. I was convinced we were being trolled by somebody at some point down the line: shame it turned out to be so-called reputable news sources >_<

  4. Who cares what she said, she wrote the books! It’s her story, not ours! I love Harry Potter, but we wouldn’t have him (or any of them for that matter), if she didn’t think them up. So, she has a right to say, or not say, anything she wants.

  5. “So we finally reach a point that should satisfy all true Harry Potter fans: the story does not change.”

    Excuse me….ALL TRUE Harry Potter fans?! So because I ship a completely plausible ship, in your eyes, I AM NOT A TRUE FAN?!

    THIS ^ is the type of audacity that we (Harmony shippers) have had to
    deal with, and we are STILL dealing with it! How DARE you. Where do you
    get the right to consider yourselves TRUE fans?

    Screw you. I am so done with your bull and your bias. *You* disgrace the name of Harry Potter fans.

    • I think you unfortunately misinterpreted my meaning. I have no problem with people shipping Harry and Hermione. As I stated in this piece, I think Rowling did a beautiful job of acknowledging the legitimacy of the ship and gave a nod to what might have been with those two.

      My quote that you’ve misinterpreted is rather remarking on how Potter fans would not want J.K. Rowling to go back and re-write the books and change the story/outcome.

      • I didn’t misunderstand your meaning. I’m sure you are telling the truth about not having an issue with the H/Hr pairing, but your article does not fully reflect that.

        And once again, please do not lump a good portion of fans’ opinions to stand for the whole. You said how Potter fans wouldn’t want her to re-write/change the series, when in actuality there are plenty of fans who would welcome such a change. You can’t discredit the opinions of others so flippantly. It’s not factual, short-sighted, and quite frankly, offensive.

        (Also, after re-reading your editorial: Why would the chance of Ron not being paired with Hermione mean that he’d be unhappy? Perhaps he could have found love elsewhere. Its the continued assumption that the pair are nothing without one another that continue to upset me (as a fan in general). The characters are all strong in their individual rights. This isn’t like Twilight (no offense to those fans), where the story focuses on relationships to make the characters happy.)

        Your article, like many found on Mugglenet, choose to focus solely on the Ron/Hermione pairing.

        I do however, give you credit, as you address that the creater/writer always has valued input about her own story. The readers can feel a sense of ownership/attachment to it, but that doesn’t mean they can discredit the author’s opinion. At least you point out that out in your editorial. I’ve seen many other articles/posts slam her for voicing her opinion.

        But I stand by what I said in my original post in the comments. You wrote, ‘should satisfy all true Harry Potter fans’. You cannot and should not discount other fans because they don’t recognize the canon ship. That doesn’t lessen or cheapen them in the fandom.

        Also, your article chooses to solely focus on the quotes about Ron/Hermione, and doesn’t include any quotes whatsoever about the Harry/Hermione pairing, and how well they would have worked.

        • I think the point he’s making here, is that true fans would not want JKR to suddenly come out and change every thing we believed for so long. Whether you or anyone likes Ron and Hermione, they are together, they end up married, it’s cannon and with in the universe it’s fact.

          If JKR had really come back years post the publication of DH and said, “Hey I screwed up, it should have been Harry and Hermione” that certainly ruins a lot for fans of the series.

          It has nothing to do with shipping a certain pairing making you a true fan. It’s that a true fan would not want to have to question if everything she wrote is really what she meant, or if she’s having second thoughts.

          • The problem is his terminology. I am just as much a ‘true fan’ to the series, but cannot back (and never had) the pairings the way the happened in the books (films). I think the term that would be more appropriate here, would be ‘purist’. Those who want to leave the series untouched.

            The pairings as they stood in the series, ruined the books for a lot of us, and although we hate it, we don’t whine about it.

            The main problem I saw within this fandom, was that fans (predominantly purists/’true fans’ as is labeled here) were attacking her for voicing her opinion. Its her work, its her characters…she has that right. And I am glad that this editorial points that out.

            I think the majority of the Harry/Hermione shippers appreciate above all, the fact that Jo articulated why Harry and Hermione would make such a great couple. As opposed to hearing nonstop abuse from other opposing shippers in the fandom. Which can easily taint the experience as an overall Potter fan.

            I’m just saying, ship whomever you want. More power to ya. Just don’t assume one ship is better than another, and don’t claim to be ‘true fans’ of a series. If you love the characters and story overall, that can make you a ‘true fan’. Just be careful with how you classify fans. Thank you.

    • And here you go again… next you’ll compare your plight to that of black slaves, just like 10 years ago.

      Really, what more can we expect from you Harmony shippers?

  6. I would like to print this off and staple it to certain people’s faces. (Also love how you very tactfully didn’t mention Hypable by name =P)

  7. I think what’s so sad is us, the Potter fandom, the ones who dealt with the Daily Prophet sullying Harry/Dumbledore’s name in books 5 and 7 through sensationalism, fell for the media. The entire article wasn’t even out and many of us assumed our Romione ship had sunk for good. I’m sorry for doubting you, JKR, even though you taught us to never believe the media.

  8. “Oh, maybe she and Ron will be alright with a bit of counseling, you know.”

    This statement from the writer would not make me feel relieved and joyous about my ship. They are miserable but can live with it is not happiness.

  9. Umm, aren’t these fictional characters? So everyone is getting upset about a hypothetical reality for people who were already imaginary in the first place? There HAS to be something more important than this going on around you…

  10. Ashleigh Stacy-Reese

    I completely agree. What a well-written blog you have here as well. Kudos!

  11. From what I can remember about the article, didn’t JK say that the original plot had Ron and Hermione together in the end but as the story developed the characters of Harry and Hermione began to grow closer so she changed the plot back to how she originally planned it out to be. Now as an aspiring writer, I have found that the characters will change and grow as the story goes on regardless of how the initial plot might have them acting. I am a H/Hr shipper, I thought that their relationship was much more fleshed out and natural than either canon ship though my main problem with both canon ships is the fact that there is so little substance to them. Harry and Ginny barely have any interaction aside from a couple of weeks dating in book six, and while Ron and Hermione are friends for 95% of the series, their constant bickering and fighting really made me think their relationship was cliche (old married couple).

    In truth, I think that JK is not a very good romance writer, she is brilliant at creating a world and bringing characters to life but her romance in Harry Potter really turned people off IMO. If she had taken out the romance from the books, nothing really would have changed IMO, and tacking the epilogue on almost as an afterthought really didn’t help.

Leave a Reply